The coverage on the anti-FARC march did not started “one week” before the events happened, but two days before, because the march “started” two days before in some places (like USA or Australia).

Besides, no one counted with this diplomatic crisis, which takes a lot of our time, time we’d rather spent writing about the march. This is a voluntary non-profit project, so it depends on how much spare time we have.

It is clear the march for the victims is not as well organized or supported as the former one, for the reasons you may know. Nevertheless, we’ll be there, of course, and we expect to publish our first articles in Spanish later today (the march is at noon) and in English tonight or tomorrow Colombia time.

I think the unexpected diplomatic crisis will end in a similarly unexpected war. There are two presidents that were put down by the deception and the unscrupulous lies of Alvaro Uribe. They both have stated that they will not let Colombia go unpunished for what it has done in Ecuador, the raid against FARC Chavez calls a war crime, which resulted in the killing of 22 rebels during their sleep.

I still remember that you promised to give the 6th of March Rally as much coverage as you gave to the Government Sponsored Anti -FARC Rally. The latter one started to be reported one week before the events actually happened. But the second one “For the victims” have got no space here yet. Where is the balance?